7.30.2008

How Theatre Failed America - And How It Hasn't

These two articles are fascinating. First, read the amazing Mike Daisey's thoughts, below:

http://sneakyfilters.info/index.php?q=aHR0cDovL3d3dy50aGVzdHJhbmdlci5jb20vc2VhdHRsZS9Db250ZW50P29pZD01MDM4Mjk%3D

Then read TCG president Teresa Eyring's response.

http://www.tcg.org/publications/at/julyaugust08/exec.cfm

And now, discuss.

4.16.2008

And I quote...

This is from Iris Murdock's The Sea, The Sea.

"Emotions really exist at the bottom of the personality or at the top. In the middle they are acted. This is why all the world is a stage, and why the theatre is always popular and indeed why it exists: why it is like life, and it is like life even though it is also the most vulgar and outrageously facetious of all the arts. Even the middling novelist can tell quite a bit of truth. His humble medium is on the side of truth. Whereas the theatre, even at its most 'realistic', is connected with the level at which, and the methods by which, we tell our everyday lies. This is the sense in which 'ordinary' theatre resembles life, and dramatists are disgraceful liars unless they are very good. On the other hand, in a purely formal sense the theatre is the nearest to poetry of all the arts. I used to think that if I could have been a poet I would never have bothered with the theatre at all, but of course this is nonsense. What I needed with all my starved and silent soul was just that particular way of shouting back at the world. The theatre is an attack on mankind carried on by magic: to victimize an audience every night, to make them laugh and cry and suffer and miss their trains. Of course actors regard audiences as enemies, to be deceived, drugged, incarcerated, stupefied. This is partly because the audience is also a court against which there is no appeal. Art's relation with its client is here at its closest and most immediate. In other arts we can blame the client: he is stupid, unsophisticated, inattentive, dull. But the theatre must, if need be, stoop -- and stoop -- until it attains that direct, that universal communication which other artists can afford to seek more deviously and at their ease. Hence the assault, the noise, the characteristic impatience."

Discuss.

2.12.2008

A little note on Collaboration

Collaboration is one of the reasons we do the work that we do in the theatre. Collaboration should elevate process. It is the thing that hovers in the center of a venn diagram -- it's what couldn't exist individually and appears only when our visions intersect at a point. Collaboration is transparency of expectation and information. Collaboration is what can make or break an experience in the theatre. It can mean the difference between learning something, creating the possibility of excellence, and going only as far as your ego will allow, which is usually just what's on the page. It is the ability to create the space in which something might happen. It is permission to ask why? and what? It is the ability to say no. It is the power to say yes.